Why refurbishing ?

Do not repair what is not broken ! But read this: https://theaudiobeatnik.com/electrostatic-solutions-original-quad-esl-loudspeakers-introduction/

Some extracts:

The speakers degrade in three ways:

  1. The conductive coating degrades reducing efficiency typically 2-3dB. This takes decades to have any impact.
  2. The carbon comp resistors in the filter network go high in value. The network carefully balances the output of the bass panels relative to the tweeter panel. When the resistors go high it reduces the output of the bass panels upsetting the balance between the panels. Loss of bass leaned out midrange, rather hot on the top is the sonic result.
  3. The worst way they degrade is the film used in the bass panels. Quad only used Mylar film in the tweeter panel. I imagine Mylar was quite expensive in the 50s-60s.

The film that was used in the bass panels was polyolefin. Polyolefin has a lot of plasticizers in the film Mylar does not. Over time the plasticizers leech out of the film causing it to become brittle and tight. This raises the panel resonance. I have seen it raise as high as an octave. This kills bass response the reason some say they have no bass capability. They don’t in this condition!

Even if one managed to find a NOS Quad ESL, never used, it would no longer meet spec. There is no way to stop the leaching of plasticizers over time whether the speaker is in use or not.


It’s quite hard to get this information: it’s not part of official specs. My measurements on a rebuilt treble cell:

86dB/2.83V/1m@1kHz (sensitivity). By the way, I read this figure in various locations: in line with expectations.

88dB/1W/1m@1kHz (yield). Thus 12.5Ohm at this frequency (vs about 10Ohm expected).

 547 total views,  2 views today